B.O. Rolled by Putin on Missile Defense

Given what any thinking person knows about B.O.’s history, associations, and evident ideological orientation, this is no surprise, but nevertheless is still regretable.

U.S. Shelves Nuclear-Missile Shield

The White House will shelve Bush administration plans to build a missile-defense system in Poland and the Czech Republic, a move likely to cheer Moscow and roil the security debate in Europe.

Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell confirmed Thursday that a “major adjustment” is planned and said the decision was made to better protect U.S. forces and allies in Europe from Iranian missile attacks.

Let me try to parse this: we are canceling missile defense sites to better protect us and our allies from Iranian missiles…HUH? Logic check anyone?

The U.S. is basing its move on a determination that Iran’s long-range-missile program hasn’t progressed as rapidly as previously estimated, reducing the threat to the continental U.S. and major European capitals, according to current and former U.S. officials.

At least until the next Korean or bootleg Russian shipment makes port…

Now at least the Russians will play nicer though, right?

Russia on Thursday welcomed the news but said it saw no reason to offer concessions in return….”The Bush plans on the missile defense as we knew them until now were nothing more than a provocation of security in the European region,” said Dmitry Rogozin, Russia’s ambassador to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, in a phone interview.

So, from their point of view, the U.S. has been a paper tiger all along…and B.O. has now officially confirmed this to be the case.

Meanwhile…what about the other Euro allies left swinging in the breeze?

Anger in Europe as Barack Obama ‘scraps missile defence shield’

The Wall Street Journal reported that the US is to shelve the plan, which was first mooted by the Bush administration and has been a source of friction with Russia ever since.

The move would be a cause of celebration in Moscow but of real concern to Eastern European countries which have looked to Washington for support against their former imperial master Russia. The US has said the shield is to guard against attacks by rogue states, such as Iran.

The former Czech prime minister, Mirek Topolanek, said: “This is not good news for the Czech state, for Czech freedom and independence. It puts us in a position wherein we are not firmly anchored in terms of partnership, security and alliance, and that’s a certain threat.”

Not good for the U.S. and the west, as noted in the Brit press:

Barack Obama surrenders to Russia on Missile Defence

I blogged a couple of weeks ago that the Obama administration was about to abandon its plans for Third Site missile defence installations in Poland and the Czech Republic. I wrote then that “if enacted, this would represent a huge turnaround in American strategic thinking on a global missile defence system, and a massive betrayal of two key US allies in eastern and central Europe. Such a move would significantly weaken America’s ability to combat the growing threat posed by Iran’s ballistic missile program, and would hand a major propaganda victory to the Russians.”

It now looks as though the president has surrendered to Russian demands to kill off Third Site.

After noting some more about the details of B.O.’s capitulation to the will of the the ex-KGB enforcer Putin, the real kernal of this all is summed up thusly:

This is bad news for all who care about the US commitment to the transatlantic alliance and the defence of Europe as well as the United States. It represents the appalling appeasement of Russian aggression and a willingness to sacrifice American allies on the altar of political expediency. A deal with the Russians to cancel missile defence installations sends a clear message that even Washington can be intimidated by the Russian bear.

What signal does this send to Ukraine, Georgia and a host of other former Soviet satellites who look to America and NATO for protection from their powerful neighbour? The impending cancellation of Third Site is a shameful abandonment of America’s friends in eastern and central Europe, and a slap in the face for those who actually believed a key agreement with Washington was worth the paper it was written on.

B.O.’s foriegn policy looks more and more like Carter’s 2nd term.

One thought on “B.O. Rolled by Putin on Missile Defense”

  1. Defense Secretary Robert Gates says we’re not scrapping the system but replacing it with something that will better protect Europe and us from the threats determined by our best intelligence. But what does Sec. Gates know? He’s only been Secretary of Defense under two Presidents.

    http://topnews.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_US_MISSILE_DEFENSE?SITE=KELOTV&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

    CHIEF’S REPLY: Let’s see now…this is the same intelligence sources that the Democratic Congress has been shredding with regularity for providing information in keeping with the desired policies. Which way does THAT knife cut?

    Replacing it with something better? Right…and the check’s in the mail…really. It is!

    Also, being SECDEF under two presidents giving the mark of good policies? The Chief seems to recall a predecessor of Mr. Gates…hmmmmm. Oh, yeah, his name was McNamara! Appointed by non other than the King of Camelot himself, JFK, and continued under President LBJ (much beloved by the Donkey Party for the so-called Great Society mass expansion of government). Of course, poor ole’ LBJ decided he couldn’t run for re-election…a slight problem resulting from McNamara’s Band playing out of tune by gradually (and ineffectually) trying to fight a war in Vietnam without actually admitting it back home (until it was too late to turn things around with an appropriate use of military force).

    Not exactly the best precedent. I remain skeptical about Mr. Gates…after all, he WAS appointed by Bush, and then re-appointed by B.O. (And yes, that IS a disparaging remark about Dubya!)

Comments are closed.